About the editorial team behind this review site
An independent editorial resource that reviews Exinity for readers in India, with no affiliation to the broker and no financial services of any kind.
Partner trading platformsUnderstand where the reader stands
If you are considering opening an account with a broker, you are usually weighing a handful of practical questions: what the platform actually does, what it costs, how withdrawals are handled, and what happens when something goes wrong. The pages on this site exist to help you work through those questions before you commit any money. We review Exinity for readers in India, and we do it as an independent editorial resource.
To be clear about what this site is not: we are not the broker. We are not affiliated with Exinity, we do not receive instructions from it, and we do not operate any financial service. We do not open accounts, take deposits, place trades on anyone's behalf, or give investment advice. Nothing published here is a recommendation to trade or a suggestion that any product suits your circumstances.
What we do is read, check and write. The team is small and editorial in nature. Our work is aimed at readers who want a plain account of what a broker offers and what it does not, rather than promotional copy.
Check facts at the source
Facts on this site come from primary material wherever possible: the broker's own published terms and conditions, fee schedules, product documentation and public disclosures, together with the platform itself where it can be observed without opening a funded account. Where a claim cannot be traced to something we can point to, we either leave it out or say plainly that it is unverified.
Checking is a separate step from writing. Figures such as spreads, commissions, minimum deposits and withdrawal conditions are compared against the source document at the time of drafting, and any discrepancy between what is advertised and what the documents say is noted in the review rather than smoothed over. We do not accept payment for a favourable assessment, and no broker sees a page before it is published.
We also distinguish between what is documented and what is reported. If something rests on user accounts or on our own observation rather than on a published term, the text says so. That distinction matters more than any single number in a review.
Revisit pages as conditions change
Broker terms move. Fees are revised, product ranges change, deposit and withdrawal rules are adjusted, and the regulatory picture around a firm can shift. A review that was accurate a year ago may mislead a reader today, so pages are revisited on a regular cycle and sooner when we learn that something material has changed.
Each review carries the date it was last checked. When we revise a page, we correct the substance rather than adding a note at the bottom, so the current version is the one you read. Where a change is significant enough that a reader who acted on the earlier version would want to know, we say what changed.
We cannot promise that a page reflects a change made by the broker this morning. What we can promise is that the review is dated, that the cycle is kept to, and that we do not leave stale figures standing once we know they are wrong.
Recognise what a review cannot tell you, and challenge what we publish
A review describes a broker as it appears from the outside. It cannot tell you whether the platform will suit the way you work, whether you will be comfortable with its execution during a fast market, or how a dispute between you and the firm will end. It cannot see your finances, your experience or your tolerance for loss. Judgements about suitability are yours, and where professional advice is needed, the review is no substitute for it.
Reviews are also written by people, and people make mistakes. If you believe something on this site is wrong, out of date or unfair, tell us. The contact form on this site reaches the editorial team directly; include the page, the statement you dispute and, where you have one, the source that supports your reading. We look at every challenge, correct errors openly, and explain our reasoning when we decide the original text stands.
